TABLE OF CONTENTS

The purpose of this TOC is to make it easier to get to posts that might be of particular interest to the visitors. To this end, I've added a brief description of what can be found in each post. To get to the post, just click the title in the TOC. No need to use the archives. To return just click the "Return to TOC" label at the end of each post.

When I created this TOC I just followed the order entry, but this just leaves what I feel are the most important posts under the pile. These were the reason I started the blog. It was my intention to make available information not as well known nor so readily available on the internet. What I am doing now is bringing those posts to the front of the TOC. Chronological order is still maintained in the archives. For now, as I decide what is the best order. I’m also thinking of just adding the links to the related posts in the description of the main topic. This will be a work in progress.

I'd appreciate it if you'd drop me a comment if you find this useful.

Also, I've added a translator 01/21/11. I've had bad luck with them in the past and doubt their effectiveness. I would appreciate it if anyone with a fair working knowledge of English who translates any part of this blog would let me know if the meaning is badly distorted. Thanks.

New World Order - Death of America 1940's map of the world showing the globalists' plans for placing the sheeples of the world into regional superstates as a first step toward world government. The plan accompanying the map is given separately. That is followed by my take on the map plan as it is still evolving today. A long list of quotes about a “New World Order” or world government shows that this idea has a long history and was not an invention of George H.W. Bush as some still think. NOTE: Newer graphics programs may be able to handle jpeg 2000. If you have one that does, the download of the map from the Library of Congress is now easy and worth it.

Regionalism – The Death of the American System The federal program to eliminate our States and local governments or to render them provinces of the Washingtonian Empire. A number of maps include the 1930's plan to consolidate the States into federal regions, the “Crime of '54”, Nixon's follow up on the 30's plan and others.

---------------------------------------------------

The regular order begins below.

---------------------------------------------------
OBITUARY
Announcing and mourning the tragic death of America.

AMNESTY IS TREASON
Why those supporting amnesty for illegal aliens are traitors.

Surprise! Surprise!
Obamacare moving toward its inevitable collapse.  What more can they take from us to save the Obamanation?

ALPHA & OMEGA and the Left vs. Right Myth
The Left vs. Right dog & pony show exposed as a control mechanism.

America and Islamophobia
The Islamic countries have stood in the way of the Bankers for years.  America has been assigned the dirty work of destroying them.

Then and Now
A campaign pamphlet I published when I ran for State Assembly some 30 years ago.  My stance has changed little since then.

Pizza Registration
One of the two stories here is an absurd fiction and the other the truth.  Can you tell which is which?

Merry Christmas
A few things to ponder this Christmas Day.

Myths, Misconceptions, and Misdirections
A few thoughts and concepts I've developed or adopted over the years about some popular but questionable ideas.  Some of those ideas can have serious consequences if widely accepted.

Jury Nullification
Trial by Jury - When used properly is the ultimate check against tyranny.

Earth Day - A Failed Conservation Attempt

The fate of the Liberty Tree?

Dream? Or Nightmare of Reality?

Were the sacrifices of so many all in vain?

Unique Terrorists

Our enemy, the Department of (in)Justice, continues to catagorize Americans who don't Goosestep to the government's marching music as terrorists and extremists. In this case it's Bernard von NotHaus, developer of the "Liberty Dollar" and any who speak the truth about our fraudulent monetary system.

A Retraction

After further reading, I lost hope of Canada being a beacon of freedom.

Canadian Liberty...Lost...Regained...Lost Again

Brief email exchange shows how Canada freed itself from the economic yoke placed on it by the bankers and how the yoke was once more put in place with disastrous consequences.

Go Ahead. Tread On Me

Following the shootings in Arizona, we are likely to be faced with another drive to leave us defenseless in the face of an ever more aggressive and oppressive government. Those who prefer to deal with obedient servants rather than free men will attempt to further disarm us. This is a timely reminder from the annals of Paul Harvey of what happens to disarmed people.

Some Old Thoughts My responses to a 1996 survey mailed by the Republican National Convention and titled "Mandate for Leadership. I just found it in files I'd taken from an old computer. I think the answers are just as valid today.

PLEASE HELP!!!

UK Times article shedding light on the plight of the poor investment bankers and my personal appeal for help for them.

Regulation, Reform, and My Uncle Remus

Some interesting information from the UK's Financial Times and some words of wisdom from my Uncle Remus on the use of regulation and reform by big business to destroy competition.

Still Working The Plan

Update On Fulfillment of the 1941-42 Plan for China.

Platform of the Maine Republican Party

This is the current platform of the Maine Republican Party. If sincere, it represents a solid step toward restoring the Constitution, State sovereignty, and saving our national sovereignty. It should be adopted and adhered to by more State parties.

Obamacare Simplified

Contains a link to a roadmap of Obamacare. Makes understanding the plan simple. Download the PDF to explain the plan to your friends and family and gain their respect.

North American Union

A Canadian view of the North American Union in an article posted by the Canadian Action Party. It's a great start on understanding what the NAU is all about. You can also see the future of the NAU by following the machinations of the European Union which is the same idea but has a headstart. Refer also to the post "New World Order -- Death of America."

Government of Money, by Money, and for Money

Lysander Spooner's assessment of the link between money and government.

Boycott Seattle

Seattle and a couple of other U.S. cities have had the audacity to attack Arizona for its defence of our borders and sovereignty.

A Pairadocs

I sent a copy of Hardy Wright's AllVoices post to an internet doctor friend and received this inside view of the health care situation.

Ugly Face of ObamaCare Revealed

Government publication reveals that the opponents of ObamaCare who were accused of lying, fear mongering, partisan politics, and even racism were telling the truth in the face of the Obama Mob lies.

Truth Has Fallen and Taken Liberty with It

I don't know how, in his career, Dr. Paul Craig Roberts could have written anything more important than this excellent analysis of the sorry state of our union. If I were to try to sum it up, I couldn't do better than these two sentences that comprise his second paragraph and the two paragraphs that close the article:

"Today Americans are ruled by propaganda. Americans have little regard for truth, little access to it, and little ability to recognize it."

"With over 21 per cent unemployment as measured by the methodology of 1980, with American jobs, GDP, and technology having been given to China and India, with war being Washington’s greatest commitment, with the dollar over-burdened with debt, with civil liberty sacrificed to the “war on terror,” the liberty and prosperity of the American people have been thrown into the trash bin of history.

The militarism of the U.S. and Israeli states, and Wall Street and corporate greed, will now run their course. As the pen is censored and its might extinguished, I am signing off."

The Lies Won't Stop

An email from 8th Congressional District Gauleiter Patrick Murphy continuing the lies and demagoguery used by proponents throughout the campaign, together with my comments and a letter I'd written to the local paper.

Healthcare Obamanation

This monstrosity will kill healthcare in America. I predict that if it goes through, two things will happen. Firstly, a huge bureaucracy will be created that will allow Obama to claim jobs creation. In reality it will be institutionalized unemployment. Secondly, ten years from now there will be a steady stream of wetbacks crossing the Rio Grande at night seeking healthcare--in Mexico.

Hen House Safe - Fox in Charge of Security

"Our" government has appointed one of the principle architects of the derivatives scheme to a key position in AIG management. Management of "risks" will be one of his functions.

Regionalism - Death of the French System

Regionalism, the cancer that is eating State, local, and national governments is seen in France in this report from the UK Financial Times. Some of the points made by Times reporter Hollinger closely parallel the scheme being foisted on America.

A Small Victory - Maybe!

The people of NJ defeat globalist Corzine who wanted to lower cost of NJ government by eliminating the towns and boroughs. This was just a continuation of the scheme outlined in the "Regionalism - Death of the American System" post in this blog.

A report from 1977 shows how the regionalists are working to make their crimes legal by changing the Constitution, either by a convention or by Supreme Court perversions.

A Prophecy From England

An Englishman talks of the losses to British sovereignty and rights under the European Union and thereby gives us a preview of what to expect when our national sovereignty fades into the murky depths of the North American Union.

The Revolution Was

An excerpt from Garet Garret's treatise on the “New Deal.” Stop looking for a revolution that will destroy the American system. It already happened.

Good Summary of Our Current Condition

Taken verbatim from the propagandawerks blog, this gives an all too real evaluation of the State of the Union....maybe of the world.

Resistance - Continues

Resistance to usurpation of the rights of the States is growing. We can only hope it's not too late. The ohiorepublic blogspot is tracking progress. Follow the link in the post.

Regionalism - Resistance

Resistance to federal encroachment in Oklahoma has been spurred by a federal injunction against one of the most sensible illegal aliens law in the States. A resolution by OK representative Charles Key stalled at a 24-24 vote, but at least there are 24 Americans in the Oklahoma legislature. The text of the resolution is here.

New Voice

The prestigious Financial Times, British counterpart of the Wall Street Journal, now sees the coming of a world government, in fact, reporter Gideon Rachman practically gloats over it. There are some interesting revelations in the article, but perhaps the most revealing is the fact that European Union measures are obtained more easily when they are “pushed through” without reference to the people. The globalists preach democracy when they can sucker the people into following their plans, but when they can't, then we get “leadership,” you know, “Das Fuehrer Prinzip.”

New World Order - Death of America

1940's map of the world showing the globalists' plans for placing the sheeples of the world into regional superstates as a first step toward world government. The plan accompanying the map is given separately. That is followed by my take on the map plan as it is still evolving today. A long list of quotes about a “New World Order” or world government shows that this idea has a long history and was not an invention of George H.W. Bush as some still think.
NOTE: Newer graphics programs may be able to handle jpeg 2000. If you have one that does, the download of the map from the Library of Congress is now easy and worth it.

Regionalism – The Death of the American System

The federal program to eliminate our States and local governments or to render them provinces of the Washingtonian Empire. A number of maps include the 1930's plan to consolidate the States into federal regions, the “Crime of '54”, Nixon's follow up on the 30's plan and others.

America and Islamophobia

First published 3/18/12.  This edit reflects material added when this was reposted in WordPress on 7/15/12.

When the money powers behind our government sought to embark us on the path of imperialism, the Spanish were vilified by the propaganda machine to get the American people to fight. Terrible atrocities were attributed to Spanish soldiers. They were, of course, lies, but they, together with the “accidental” sinking of the Maine [was this a prelude to the recent “false flag” events?] were enough to precipitate the Spanish American War and send young Americans to fight, kill, and die for such a “just” cause. The real reason for the war, as in the Middle East wars of today, was a regime change desired in Washington, or, at least, by those controlling it.

When Wilson promised the British that he would bring America into the war against Germany, some of the same atrocity stories were trotted out. This time the soldiers wore German uniforms. When the British set up the Lusitania for a torpedo attack it was icing on the cake. The American people were not told that her escort had been withdrawn while she was sailing in waters the British knew were submarine infested. They certainly were not aware of conversations revealed in this excerpt from “The Intimate Papers of Colonel House” edited by Charles Seymour, Houghton Mifflin, 1926:

On the morning of May 7, House and Grey drove out to Kew. 'We spoke of the probability of an ocean liner being sunk,' recorded House, 'and I told him if this were done, a flame of indignation would sweep across America, which would in itself probably carry us into the war.' An hour later, House was with King George in Buckingham Palace. 'We fell to talking, strangely enough,' the Colonel wrote that night, 'of the probability of Germany sinking a trans-Atlantic liner....He said, “Suppose they should sink the Lusitania with American passengers on board....'”

That evening House dined at the American Embassy. A despatch came in, stating that at two in the afternoon a German submarine had torpedoed and sunk the Lusitania off the soulthern coast of Ireland. Many lives had been lost.

The British had been planning the set up and they knew they could count on House not to blow the whistle.

Less than fifty years later, the Germans became the bad guys once again. This time the American people were even more determined that they would not be suckered into another war for the British Empire (the Empire of the Bank), so another horrible, inhuman enemy had to be created. It was the Japanese. The money powers wanted war and FDR was their willing stooge. He committed several acts of war against the Japanese, but they wouldn't bite. Finally, under the pretext of good faith negotiation, he sent them an ultimatum that he knew would leave the Japanese no alternative but war. He set up Pearl for a “sneak” attack that would prove how “treacherous” the Japanese were and would drive the American people to fight. This resulted in the opportunity FDR wanted to get into the “European War” for Mutha England or maybe for his beloved Bolshevik Russia.

Now Islam appears to be the last obstacle in the plans of the money powers to control the entire world through their “New World Order.” The Islamic countries must go, or a government of the money powers, by the money powers, and for the money powers must be installed in each. To help these international gangsters to achieve their plans, Americans have been given a new enemy complete with unspeakable atrocities.

It's sad, but I truly believe that not one American soldier, sailor, or airman has died fighting for America in over a hundred years. They thought they were fighting for America, but they were fighting to establish the hegemony of international finance and multinational corporations. There is little doubt of that now.

Today, that hegemony has total control of our military. An article in Off the Grid News on 031012 told it all.

On March 8, testifying at a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman General Martin Dempsey indicated that international permission was the legal basis for any military action taken by the United States. Congressional approval wasn't required.

When specifically asked by Senator Sessions, Panetta indicated that Congress had no say in the matter of the use of U.S. military force. This was up to the “international community.” In sane times, Panetta and General Dempsey would be hanged for treason.

Not long ago, I saw a video of "American" troops returning from the Middle East. They were wearing blue berets and a U.N. patch on their uniforms. They were not American soldiers. They were U.N. soldiers. Any war crimes they may have committed should be laid at the feet of the U.N. officials and they should be put on trial.

Back to Islam. Take a look at the map in the “New World Order – Death of America” post in this blog. You can see that the 1941-42 plans for the Mideast have been largely thwarted by Islam.

http://lostliberty1.wordpress.com/2012/04/09/new-world-order-death-of-america/

[Note: I'm removing maps and graphics from my blogspot blogs. Google seems to be in league with some sort of spy sites. Clinking on maps or pictures in the blogs redirects to those sites. Google claims to know nothing about it, at least as of 5/28/12.]

When the “international community” [the bankers of the NWO] dictates, we will attack Iran or any other country that stands in their way.

Of course, the American people would not go along with a hate campaign just because the bankers and our bank owned government want them to. Just as incidents had to be contrived to generate hatred for Spain, Germany, Japan, and others, an incident had to be contrived to make the American people hate Muslims and the Muslim countries that wouldn’t play ball with the banksters. That contrived incident was 9/11.

More and more people are demanding a legitimate investigation into who and what was behind the destruction of the Twin Towers and what really brought them down. Those people include first responders who were at the scene, architects and engineers who say the buildings could not have been brought down by planes crashing into them or the ensuing fires, and airline pilots who think it absurd that an inexperienced pilot who couldn’t even fly a single engine plane could have put a huge commercial airliner through the manuevres involved in hitting the Pentagon. Some say the plane could not have withstood the stresses, it was, after all, a commercial liner and not a jet fighter built to be flown that way.

Naturally, there are those who believe all of this is “conspiracy theory,” or at least they claim to believe that. Not all are fools. No doubt many have a vested interest in getting the American public to go along with the government version of 9/11 and hate all Muslims and support invasion of their countries and the slaughter of their people. They want us to believe the 9/11 conspiracy theory promoted by the government. As this U-Tube video shows, it is the most absurd conspiracy theory yet to come out of 9/11:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yuC_4mGTs98&feature=player_embedded

An interesting side note is this video of mysterious (convenient?) deaths of witnesses and people involved in the search for 9/11 truth:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&feature=endscreen&v=bvay28lZiHU

Not all consider this conspiracy theory. An individual using the screenname \IV/ posted this commentary on Sodahead 6/20/12. He suggests a religious movement.

->A new religious movement was born September 11th, 2001. This movement was conceived by the American government and comprises many members of the American and European elite, politicians, editors of mass and so-called alternative media, publishers and academics. The movement’s unifying faith is the legend of 9/11, namely that 19 Arab terrorists hijacked four airliners and flew these airliners into the known landmarks in a suicide operation. The legend of 9/11 is composed of a number of distinct beliefs. Here are ten of the most tenacious beliefs that unite cult members:

1. They believe that 4 young pilots who love money, alcohol and sex, could be convinced to kill themselves for a religious purpose.

2. They believe that four teams of four to five rather smallish men could subdue 40 to 80 passengers without using firearms and without raising the suspicion of the pilots.

3. They believe it is possible to subdue a pilot and co-pilot in their flight cabin before either can transmit a hijacking code, a verbal Mayday message, or raise the suspicion of the crew.

4. They believe a person who could hardly control a one-engine Cessna can fly a Boeing passenger airliner on instruments alone for more than an hour in a foreign country and crash this airliner at 500 mph into the side of a building 20 feet above ground.

5. They believe the capital of the United States, Washington, D.C. , is undefended against approaching unidentified aircraft.

6. They believe crashing aircraft can disintegrate, leaving no visible debris such as fuselage, wings, tail or engine.

7. They believe an airliner with 45 passengers can crash without leaving visible bodies and blood.

8. They believe debris from a crashing airplane can be found eight miles away.

9. They believe it is possible to induce a free-fall collapse of a skyscraper by hitting it with an airplane (even if the skycraper was designed to withstand such a strike) and then letting the resulting fire bring it down.

10. They believe that 19 Arab terrorists actually boarded the four aircraft that crashed on 9/11.

Religious movements are generally peaceful, but this is not the case with the 9/11 Cult. The cult’s members control weapons of mass destruction and the information flow to the public. When such powers are concentrated in the hands of cult members who base their decisions on irrational and unsubstantiated beliefs, rather than on facts, everyone is in danger.

Members of this cult, no matter their status, fame or power, must be designated as madmen. It is important to secure the removal of such madmen from positions of influence and power as soon as possible, in order to give international peace and security a chance.<- \IV/

I would add a great big religious “Amen” to that last paragraph.

Return to TOC

NEW VOICE

On December 8, 2008, the voices of those warning of the creation of a dictatorial world government were joined by the voice of the widely read and highly respected Financial Times, British counterpart of the Wall Street Journal.

But the Times does not warn. It greets the prospect with joyful anticipation. Little wonder! Martin H. Wolf - Associate Editor and Economics Commentator for the Times is a Trilateral Commission member and an attendee from Great Britain at the 2003 Bilderberg meeting in Versailles, Paris, France.

In his times article, "And now for a world government," Gideon Rachman says he never before believed there was a "plot to take over the US," but he now believes world government is possible.

This according to Rachman, "would involve much more than co-operation between nations." He says that the European Union, "a continental government for 27 countries" with a supreme court, a common currency, reams of law, a large bureaucracy, and military power, could be a model.

The author cites three reasons why he thinks the EU model could be used for a world government.

The first reason is the "international" nature of problems facing national governments. These include: global warming, global financial crisis, and the "war on terror."

The second, says Gideon, is the transportation and communications advancements that "have shrunk the world." Apparently it is no longer over 25,000 miles in circumference at the Equator. Regardless, I don’t see how that pertains specifically to the European Union "model." Never-the-less, that’s what he says.

The third Rachman says, most important to those who expect "change" for the better with Obama, is "a change in the political atmosphere" that could speed the coming of "global governance."

Rachman rehashes global warming and the financial crisis, but then adds that president elect Obama "does not share the Bush administration’s disdain for international agreements and treaties." I’ll admit I’m a little confused about the Bush administration’s disdain for international agreements. If it has such disdain, why has Bush been involved in negotiations for a North American Union? Anyway, Mr. Rachman quotes Obama’s book, The Audacity of Hope: "When the world’s sole superpower willingly restrains its power and abides by internationally agreed-upon standards of conduct, it sends a message that these are rules worth following." Like the European Union, it doesn’t seem to matter if the government must surrender part or all of national sovereignty over, under, or around the people if they can’t do it through them.

Further proof of the importance of the UN to Obama, according to the author, is his appointment of Susan Rice [Trilateral Commission and Council on Foreign Relations member] as ambassador to the UN at cabinet level.

In addition, Obama and his team are apparently being influenced by a Managing Global Insecurity project report. Project advisors include John Podesta the co-chair of Obama’s transition team and Strobe Talbott, the president of the Brookings Institution and member of the Trilateral Commission.

Rachman says, "The MGI report argues for the creation of a UN high commissioner for counter-terrorist activity, a legally binding climate-change agreement negotiated under the auspices of the UN and the creation of a 50,000-strong UN peacekeeping force. Once countries had pledged troops to this reserve army, the UN would have first call upon them." I’ll have to take his word for it because every attempt I made to download a PDF copy hung my computer.

Rachman continues, "These are the kind of ideas that get people reaching for their rifles in America’s talk-radio heartland." Let’s be thankful they still have those rifles and hope they have a good place to hide them when the FedStapo comes to collect them. I suppose if the peoples of Europe don’t have rifles, they will reach for their balls and chains, pick them up, and move in the direction their EU Masters tell them.

I like the way Rachman refers to the "soothing language" used by the MGI report, such as "responsible sovereignty." Responsible sovereignty to MGI means a nation’s leaders must consider the welfare of the people of other nations as well as their own. I interpret that as put others first if need be. If I’m right in my assessment, then "responsible sovereignty" is certainly more "soothing language" than treason.

A telling part of the article is a quote of Jacques Attali, an adviser to President Nicolas Sarkozy of France, he believes that the "core of the international financial crisis is that we have global financial markets and no global rule of law". I’ve said this for a long time. International finance and the multi-national megacorporations want power to lie at the level of their economic interests so all can be manipulated to protect and further those interests. The interests of the peoples of the world be damned.

Despite apparent "progress" toward world government, Rachman laments that achievement of "global governance" "will be a painful, slow process." He cites as a bad reason for this the national and political leaders’ "lack of will and determination." They are, he opines, "more focused on their next election."

Incomprehensibly to me, he says this "hints at a more welcome reason" for slow "progress" toward "global governance." This sounds as if he wants slow "progress." Regardless, while he calls the EU the "heartland of law-based international government" he admits the idea is unpopular. When the EU has attempted to implement its plans through referendum, he says the voters have handed it a "series of humiliating defeats."

But progress has been fastest, according to Rachman, when "far-reaching deals" have been "pushed through" without reference to the citizens (subjects?). He notes a tendency of "international governance" to be effective only when anti-democratic. Could it be that conditioning the people to obey the dictates of the EU power elite in this way is why it is welcome in Rachman’s eyes? It seems clear to me that the author’s idea of "law-based" government is dictatorship. Heaven forbid that "leaders" be more concerned about the will of the people than about the will of international finance.

Rachman concludes that "the world’s most pressing political problems may indeed be international in nature, but the average citizen’s political identity remains stubbornly local. Until somebody cracks this problem, that plan for world government may have to stay locked away in a safe at the UN."

I don’t know if Rachman is aware that it’s too late to hide the plan from the people. It was already published along with a map showing the plans that were current when compiled and published in 1941-42.

Cracking the problem of the people "stubbornly" identifying themselves with their country, their heritage, and their customs and beliefs; cracking the problem of the peoples’ unwillingness to surrender what liberty and individuality they have left to be worker bugs in the great world corporate anthill, may not be as difficult as Rachman thinks. After all, the New World Order will have its 50,000 man "peacekeeping" force.

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/7a03e5b6-c541-11dd-b516-000077b07658.html


Return to TOC